JasonColeman.com

« July 2006 | Main | September 2006 »

August 31, 2006

How FAKE is Burning Man. . .

This is going to take a while, and you still might not get it. . .my apologies in advance if this is the case.

Oh what has become of my beloved Burning Man. Ok, for starters, that's a bit much, even for me. So let's back up.

I've been to a couple of Burning Man celebrations in the Nevada desert. People who are familiar with me generally find this to be a shock. The festival is a moonbat carnival to most people, it's really not, but that's what people portray it as. Let me be straight though, Burning Man IS a moonbat carnival, it's a hippy freak show, it's a bunch of leftist morons sitting in the desert talking about how great Communism is. It's about raw unadulterated sex and violence, it's about free-love and all that jazz.

Burning Man is a lot of other things also. It's about showing up in the middle of nowhere and creating a city, on the fly, on demand. It's also about destroying that city and dancing around it in glee as it burns. It's an oxymoron wrapped in an enigma obscured by camouflage. In short, it's great fun.

Some people have called Burning Man "Mardi Gras on steroids." Let me assure you it's not. It is, but it's not. The night of the burn is like "Mardi Gras on steroids with some blotter acid and an IV drip of tequila". I could talk about the Burn night, but that's not the intent of this post.

The "Community of Burning Man" is a special thing. It's spontaneous, friendly, open, loving and accepting. It's also EXTREMELY judgmental if you're. . . say . . . religious (but only mainstream religion, trying to organize a traditional Canonical Catholic service wouldn't make you any friends, but a hippy dippy worship ceremony with actors playing out the Moon and Sun having intercourse will get you lots of play from the "spiritual" among Burners.) Religion is just one example, if you were to seriously show up with a Pro-Bush, Pro-War or Pro-Israel viewpoint, you'd also most likely be ostracized if you admitted so publically or loudly. Likewise if you had anti-homosexual viewpoints, or a number of other views. Burning Man is tolerant, but it's also intolerant.

Personally, I love Burning Man, I don't agree with half the things other people there do or say, but as I look at, they don't agree with half of the things I do or say too, so it balances. I can say so many horrible things about Burners, each paired with a great thing. It's a brief glimpse of a "possibility for Community" that I can certainly agree with and accept. I could live in a year round Burning Man, I would probably be successful and thrive while generally being pretty happy.

95%+ of Americans and 99%+ of other inhabitants could most certainly not write that above paragraph and mean it.

Burning Man is an ideal living set, it's a fantasy land where there is virtually no crime, no personal property, no income, no expenses, a barter economy based on gifting rather than trading, environmentally friendly (apart from the massive burning destruction at the end of course), tolerant, safe, secure and a haven for personal liberty.

Simply put, most human beings can't handle that. That's not an insult, it's just an examination of reality. Most humans want and need a sense of structure and order, they need to know that there is a "safety net" of public infrastructure (non-Westernized nations less so), they need to know that their personal property and security of person is protected by an organized and capable force. They need to know that the mail will come, not because someone has created a cool art project and is playing mailman, they need to know that the mail will come regardless of whether or not the artist continues his personal commitment. Most need to know that there will be oversight of public eating facilities, clean potable water, etc etc etc. Burning Man delivers all these things, so to the supporter of Burning Man, they may not understand what I'm saying, BUT, at Burning Man, these things are FAKE, they are an illusion. Yeah, there's WiFi now at Burning Man, but it's not economically stable, it couldn't support a society. There's mail at Burning Man, but you couldn't trust it for commerce. There's so so much to see and do and touch and feel and play with and jump on and roll in and more, that Burning Man FEELS real. It FEELS like something you could get behind and support as a "lifestyle".

Alas dear reader, it's FAKE, completely FAKE.

Fake people, doing fake things, creating fake art, in a fake city. It seems real when you're wrapped up in the moment, but in reality, it's just a "vacation", it's not real, and it can't be real, because if it were real, you'd have to support it. For it to be real, people would have to make more of a commitment to it than taking a week off from work and spending evenings and weekends creating costumes.

There are some truly REAL people at Burning Man. In fact I'd suggest that almost all are REAL people. People who deep down realize that they are on vacation, at a great party, and as such, they are generally disposed to good behavior, having fun and not harshing their own or others vibe. That's what makes Burning Man fun, meeting these REAL people in a wholly UNREAL world. That's what makes something in your head click when you pass through the gates (or begin to pick up random CB signals if you've chosen to drive in across the dry lakebed from the East). That click is the "disconnect from reality", you're in the world of Burning Man now. Things are different.

Burning Man truly is a great experience, it's impossible to describe Burning Man in short form. Countless books and DVD's have been devoted to documenting and exploring what Burning Man is. None of them are right, they are just various perspectives offering a view of varying broadness, never encompassing the whole.

I highly recommend the event if you are of the philosophical worldview to "handle" it. To enjoy Burning Man you have to be able to rationally disconnect the two worlds, if you try to bridge them you will fail and only diminish the experience. You have to accept that the world of Burning Man is ordered chaos with outbreaks of Fascism and Anarchy, there is no law, although sometimes there is, and there is order, although sometimes there isn't. If you can "accept" this, if you "roll with it", and you can realize that it's FAKE. You can have a great time.

So I hope I've giving some of you a perspective on Burning Man. So let’s just shift gears here for a second and laugh at just "How FAKE is Burning Man. . . "

The Burners like to think of themselves (as a group) as being generally leftist/Democratic/Progressive in orientation. There are certainly exceptions, this is Burning Man after all. The "collective" of Burning Man embraces many environmentalist concepts and carries them off quite well. The event encourages it's attendees to use environmentally friendly products and to leave no trace (camping lingo: meaning to take everything you bring with you when you leave and leave the environment in as close to the same condition as you found it). There are groups that attend to assist with recycling and green cooking. The event puts a premium on being kind to the Earth and you're bombarded with environmentalist messages throughout. It's is after all a moonbat carnival, a "progressives" party.

Never mind that at the end a significant portion of the content of the event itself is set ablaze to burn unmitigated sending tons upon tons of unmitigated pollution into the atmosphere. Personally, I think it's a sacrifice on the altar of the cult of global warming, but that's another issue.

For years, they've been trying to mitigate this obvious hypocrisy between the conscious of a super-majority of attendees and their actions in burning tons upon tons of wood, paint, plastic, fabrics and other items in the open air.
But finally folks, today, that's all changed:

A group of "scientists" have "created" a way for the Burners to mitigate their destruction of the environment. Burners can now "buy credits" to compensate for their pollution.

Yes, now for just $5, you can burn away to your hearts content. Because someone in the background is going to mitigate your personal pollution, which you are creating just so you can have the joy of burning it.

What's the first project they will fund with the Burners money?

A windmill to provide power for a Native American casino.

See, I told you it was all FAKE.

--Jason

Posted by JasonColeman at 3:09 PM

August 29, 2006

Mind changing. . .

I just spent a little over two hours rummaging through The Korea Liberator.

For so many years, the United States has been the all-purpose (a) benefactor, (b) defender, and (c) scapegoat that has protected an economically strong, yet politically immature nation from making sound security decisions against a background of the hard reality that surrounds it. With a new presidential election coming, the best thing the United States could do for its own long-term interests would be to help Korean voters perceive those realities and the interests they realistically share with the United States. If Korean voters are capable of perceiving those interests, they will elect responsible statesmen who will sit down with U.S. defense planners to draw up an updated plan for an alliance that fits modern realities. If not, what makes sense won’t matter, and political pressures for a total U.S. withdrawal and a complete abrogation of the alliance will reach tipping points in both the United States and Korea.

Read the whole thing, then take some time and look around for yourself. I had alot of pre-conceived ideas about Korea (North and South) challenged, and some scary possibilities confirmed. I'm adding it to the blogroll if you can't get to it today. It's a link I don't want to misplace, and will certainly visit again, and again.

--Jason

Posted by JasonColeman at 9:57 PM

These people are nuts, but it's OK. . .

Because we get to make fun of them.

If you're unfamiliar with Yisrayl Hawkins or the House of Yahweh, take a few minutes to click the links and find out about this cult o' nuts who believe that nuclear war has been prophesized and will begin on September 12th, 2006.

Now I won't go through all of their "back up" for their claims, I'll leave that to you, but I will post this very informative video about the cult of the House of Yahweh and let you see for yourself.

--Jason

Posted by JasonColeman at 11:43 AM | TrackBack

August 28, 2006

Revisiting Katrina. . .

I was going to put up a bunch more pictures and video taken after the storm and from my subsequent trips to New Orleans (click for the Katrina archive), but I found something much more important for you, so I ask you give the time you would have allotted to me to Wizbang.

So head on over:

The Katrina Video Congress Didn't Want You To See

--Jason

Posted by JasonColeman at 7:40 PM | TrackBack

More required viewing. . .

Over at Gateway Pundit, some excellent must see video and must read coverage "When UN ambulances attack!"

--Jason

Posted by JasonColeman at 1:50 PM | TrackBack

August 27, 2006

Steve and Olaf freed. . .

Fox news, they've got Shep up early this AM, has announced that their two reporters, Steve Centani and Olaf Wiig have been released. I guess I can take a deep breath after that last post.

Nah, I'm still gonna let that all stand.

Apparently they "converted to Islam". It'll be interesting to hear what Centani reports after this.

--Jason

Posted by JasonColeman at 5:01 AM | TrackBack

August 25, 2006

Ok, so I'll lighten up a bit. . .

Most of the recent posts have been heavy handed, I haven't injected enough reason to have the blog URL passed around and dump bandwidth for no reason lately. So let's do that.

The folks at HowItShouldHaveEnded.com produce some really funny stuff. Their newest work is this one on how Superman - The Movie should have ended.

But this is my fave, partly because I'm a huge Star Wars fan (I'm not into the Expanded Universe or anything like that, although I did play Star Wars Galaxies for a while.) and partly because I feel that this is actually how the movie should have ended.

--Jason

Posted by JasonColeman at 3:24 PM

Required viewing. . .

Given my last post, I thought I'd just add this. Hezbollah, great with the kids, aren't they?

H/T to Wild Thing

--Jason

Posted by JasonColeman at 2:21 PM | TrackBack

Personally. . .(A rant)

I'm tired of this kidnapping crap. They need to release the FOX News journalists immediately, or any and all compassion I have for the people that live in that region of the world (i.e. the true "civilians") is about to evaporate.

Let me put it this way. If there were an abduction of two journalists by a "previously unknown militant group" essentially a brand new "terrorist" group in Birmingham, AL, you can bet dollars to donuts that every policeman, firefighter, FBI agent, even national guard elements would be combing the city damn near door to door.

BUT. . . They would also be joined by literally thousands of citizens who would pound the pavement themselves. Community Groups would mobilize, and every stone would be turned.

The Gaza is an anarchistic proto-state, two rival terrorist organizations, who's only governing principle is to throw cash down to the people to buy their acquiescence (despite the fact they have very little to buy) who have got themselves stuck between a rival upstart group and Israel and the U.S. breathing down their neck. They have no structures in place that would even allow them to begin conducting a door to door search, or even have the possibility of being able to manage it. Or do they????? They certainly have the forces, don't they? They have some paper and some clipboards don't they? I'm sure they have a map?

The sad fact is that the Gaza government doesn't want to find these journalists, just as the Gaza government doesn't want to give up the Israeli soldiers. They NEED war, and they NEED it sooner rather than later. They need the threat of violence to control the civilian population and get them to endure all manner of injustice. They need war because it's the only thing their particular death cults find worthy. When you base a society on the concept that the greatest death possible, with the highest attainments in heaven achieved is by murdering infidels, these fools NEED war. We'd like to think they only need this in small doses, and we could practice containment on them, but the THEY includes more than just the Gaza and Lebanese groups, it's including Iran and Syria, and while Syria could sit by almost indefinately and play the containment game, Iran is under time pressure, Iran is trying to seize it's moment. The Iran power brokers need to make their play, do their part for greater Islam and take their place at the head of the Islamic Faith. They need war/murder/death to the infidels now, because they've reached a number of critical political evolutionary points, and they've made religious promises to get there.

Let's face it, if the Catholic Church based it's access to the top slots in heaven on murder, the Big C would have never gotten off the ground under the Romans. So it's basis was on something else, commitment to Jesus, who didn't run around lopping of heads in wars of conflict. Now look, this isn't a comparison of the two, I'm just pointing out that what you base your religion on forms the nature of your civilization.

Now it's debatable what Islam is based on, just as it's debatable what Catholicism is based on. Both Islam and Catholicism have their benefits and their faults. But there is a problem, and that problem is that Islam has had their faults rise to prominence within the faith and created monsters in the process.

If you are a Muslim man, you're most likely very rational and probably a good person, trying to live a good life and make the right decisions for yourself and your family to improve your lot as you race around through space on this big blue orb. If you are a Catholic man, you're most likely doing exactly the same.

Fanaticism is what we're talking about people. Yet this isn't the fanaticism of a small cult, it's the fanaticism of MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO GREATER ASPIRATION IN LIFE BUT MURDER. That's not a cult, it's a threat to civilization itself, Muslim, Christian, Jewish, it makes no matter, this fanaticism is a threat to civilization itself.

Iran's President (sorry, I'm not gonna go find the correct spelling and cut and paste it), is one of these fanatics, his aspiration is to get to heaven and receive his 72 virgins. He sees his martyrdom as a political one, he sees his martyrdom status as delivered by his very service to the creation of the Islamic caliphate, he'll get his crack at the top spot in heaven, and he knows it. That's an EXTREMELY DANGEROUS individual to have around. There is no way in Armie's mind that he can actually fail in his quest to battle the infidel, he's already locked in what he sees as mortal conflict. This is evidenced by his letter of late to George Bush calling Bush to Islam. Armie is engaging in what he sees as ritualized combat leading up to the actual show. His war has already begun and he is playing the role of omnipotent dictator in consult with the religious powers delivered in the personages of the Imams and Ayatollahs who remain the men behind the curtain. Who in a very real sense are even greater fanatics who are even deeper in psychosis than the "fighters on the streets" and the power-brokers/Political Sheiks like Armie.

So Iran needs war. Their fanaticism demands it, to deny the Muslim masses the ability to attain the top slots in heaven is a position these fanatics cannot back down from. Once you promise someone heaven, you can't take it away, when you promise paradise, and you're using religion to do so, you're stuck, you've either got to deliver or you've gotta go Jim Jones and pass out the Kool-Aid.

Hezbollah cannot stop their war against Israel. It's not about "land", it's about God, they are after all, the "Party of God" remember. Hamas cannot stop their war either, they cannot accept defeat, because they have generations of young Palestinian men who have been bred for a purpose, that purpose was to drive out Israel. Many of these young men believe that their own way to achieve a better life for themselves is to die in martyrdom and receive the gift of paradise from Allah. Come on people!!!! Can't you see the danger here. You basically have human predators being bred and created with all rational thought stripped away, all ability to question stripped away, you then cage these people in isolation from the rest of the world and you feed them a God-construct that demands that they blow themselves up (but only where their death can create the largest number of infidel casualties).

The absurdity of this situation is coming to a crest. We as a civilization are in some extremely dangerous straights right now. I think that the Mutual Assured Destruction of the Cold War was certainly a threat, and we minded our p's and q's to keep that eventuality off the table. BUT. . . there is no such fear on the part of Islamic Fanatics, contrarily, they have devised a quite logical and ingenious tactic. They have simply abandoned the need to care for the welfare of their people. They have turned their people into cannon fodder and send them to die without reservation about how many will survive the attack because all who are sent to attack are sent to die. They have abanoned the need to care for civilians, instead using them as human shields rather than create military defenses, simply place your machinegun nests or rocket launchers in civilian areas, use the humans above and around you as meat to absorb shrapnel and bullets. It's Ok, because if these civilians die, they died in the service of Allah against the infidel, and they will be martyrs for the cause, and achieve paradise.

Is this turning your stomach yet?

There will be no peace until this fanaticism is quite literally stamped out from within while pressure is put on it from without. If no pressure comes from within, from moderate Muslim communities, no amount of outside pressure will eradicate it, and that leaves only one solution for us infidels. If there isn't a change in the Muslim street in Gaza and Lebanon, which are both proxy acts for Iran and Syria, there is going to be a serious escalation in the Middle East, and when the other side provokes Israel by kidnapping soldiers in the north and the south, and they feel that they need to bump it up a notch by kidnapping Americans as well, there comes a point where you begin to say that you've had enough provocation, and it becomes time to open up the can of whoop-ass all the way.

We are using slightly less than 15% of our combat power in Afghanistan and Iraq. We have a number of pools to pull from if we need to. Without much effort, we could put 25% of our force in the middle east and escalate the violence to a point where much of the Middle East is charred sand and the population centers are significantly reordered.

We're approaching the point of all out war people. It's a war that is being forced upon us, it's a war we've consistently said we did not want, but would not shy from. This world war is against an ideology and those that would align itself with such an ideology, that ideology is Islamic Fascism and it's fast becoming, if not past, time to start calling this a World War and get busy with winning it.

Thanks for letting me rant.

--Jason

Posted by JasonColeman at 12:24 PM | TrackBack

August 24, 2006

This is my "Gay Marriage" post. . .

NOTE: This post will be revised, revised again, and revised again, consider it my "position paper on Gay Marriage".



For the record: Gay Marriage, I'm strongly against it. However, I'm strongly supportive of civil unions.

I'm writing this post and creating an new category here because I think we've hit snag in the ongoing peace process that of late has been "gay marriage".

Here's the link "Straight woman seeks equality under gay-rights law: Unwed Redmond worker wants her male partner to receive health benefits".

Here's where the whole dealie-o which is the "gay marriage" debate will break down. Now for the record, I'm an unmarried heterosexual male atheist. I live in a committed relationship. I don't hold my opposition to gay marriage as proof of religious credentials, in fact, the religious aspect of marriage is completely immaterial to me. I could not care one whit about who buggers whom or how many penises or vaginas (or their ratios) are in a bedroom.

My arguments against gay marriage and for gay unions stem from purely sociological and economic concerns. It also speaks to the isolation of a sub-group of the body politic and grant them rights AS A SPECIFIC GROUP ONLY. Which I am strongly against, that is exactly what happened in the Washington case.

In Washington, employers were essentially forced to extend spousal benefits to homosexual couples, this benefit was DENIED to heterosexual couples. Now someone will come in and pop off and say that rights were extended to married couples, when this is simply NOT true.

What happened in this case is that an insurance company made a decision to sell their services to those that demonstrate an ability to enter into and live under a particular social construct. This social construct existed before the insurance company did and will probably exist after the insurance company is gone. Now the next thing that happend was that the employer bought said services on behalf of a subset of it's employees acting merely as an agent for said insurance company. All of this was extended as a benefit and a part of the employees compensation for labor delivered.

All of this is essentially part of the bargaining process you go into when you take a job with an employer.

NONE OF THE ABOVE CAN BE CONSIDERED A "RIGHT" IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM.

Now what has happened in Washington state, is that "gay rights" activists have created and garnered support for and implemented a program where the government will interfere with the negotiations between employer and employee and force the employer to extend additional compensation to indivdiuals who have demonstrated to the company that the ONLY THING NECESSARY for them to receive this extra compensation is to engage in homosexual sex.

Yet, an employee who conversely has a heterosexual lifestyle, is not extended this particular "right" which is granted to those that engage in homosexual sex.

This is BEYOND ludicrous on so many levels.

So here's my take. Let homosexual couples enter into civil unions. In a few days I'm going to post a do-it-yourself kit for homosexual civil unions which will work in all 50 states. You'll get access to your loved ones if they agree to the civil union and they are hospitalized, you'll be able to show that you live a committed lifestyle to each other, and you'll get a nifty civil union certificate from my Church of Common Sense Interpretations.

What else exactly is it you want from society? NO, scratch that, what exactly is it you want from the government?

Do you want to file jointly? That's easy as pie, form yourself an LLC with your partner, dump all your wages into the LLC and all your partners wages into the LLC, then pay yourselves salaries and sell your labor to your employers via the LLC. BINGO, you're married as far as the IRS is concerned, in fact you get even better loopholes and deductions. So if it's a tax matter, stay tuned and I'll give you some more detailed instructions.

Do you want to have society "accept" your lifestyle? Sorry, but that's not the pervue of government, so stop with the hammering on the government to get it. The government does not dictate the whims of society, society dictates the whims of government and society isn't going to be legislated from the bench into accepting the gay lifestyle. That's something the gay lifestyle has to do, make friends with the rest of the world. Trying to do an end run and get the Government to tell churches what to do isn't going to fly. Granting yourself special rights is only going to make society reject you more. Getting the government into everyones bedroom is not the way to get the government OUT of yours.

So what is it that the "gay marriage" proponents really want from the government? It's pretty obvious that they want the government to do their social change for them, but that's not the function of a democracy. The people drive social change, it's not handed down from above.

I'm sure the keywords here will attract the trolls, and that's ok, because in their spitting anger they'll probably drop a few allusions to what it is they really want, and that's what I'm looking for. It's also why this post will evolve over time, for now, let's just poke the nest a bit.

--Jason


I'll come back to this post from time to time and ammend it as I put down my arguments supporting my position and defending arguments attacking it. I expect I'll use this post in the future as direction for readers seeking to find my absolute opinion on the matter. I'll use it to refute trolls or just send the link around as backup for my position on other forums, blogs, etc.

It's also the first post in a new category, so this will serve as the anchorpoint for keyword relevant searches.