JasonColeman.com

« It's long past time to choose. . . | Main | Mixed Feelings. . . »

September 5, 2005

Thoughts on Katrina, a beginning. . . .

It's been very hard to put together something about the disaster in New Orleans. N.O. is my hometown, the place of my birth and where I came to realize who I was and what the world around me was like.

This hurricane was devastating to N.O. The city has been killed, it's quite possible that it can be resurrected, but not into the same form. I physically hurt for my friends and family that are suffering so much right now in the wake of this, this blow to my family is hard to wrap my mind around, but with time, we'll recover, like the city, and we'll all be stronger for it.

ANGER wells in me however, and it's hard to deconstruct it into something positive. I dwell on it constantly and resist the urge to lash out, instead I've been focusing on understanding the failure and breakdown of the systems and communities in the wake of the Hurricane and the second disaster of the breached levees after the storm passed.

There are many out there ready to blame President Bush. There are some that blame him for global warming, asserting that Bushco and the oil companies in the past five years have somehow cranked the pseudo-science of global warming into high gear, that his policies have somehow created more frequent and dangerous hurricanes. They don't want to acknowledge that the United States is actually a NET ABSORBER of greenhouse gasses, or that hurricane ferocity and frequency is actually on a downswing right now.

Others try to blame Bush by saying he's racist, wants black people to die and somehow delayed efforts to get the poor out of New Orleans. It doesn't matter to these people that it was actually President Bush that prompted the evacuation[1] after local officials refused to do so, and of course they've never been comfortable with admitting that the Bush Administration is more racially diverse than any administration previous.

Still others try to blame Bush by saying that he failed to act quick enough getting federal troops into the city. I'm sorry, and you know what, I wish that Bush had dropped regular Army troops in day one, but there are certain things that have to be recognized in this situation.

First and foremost was the law forbiding posse comitatus:

Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known as the Posse Comitatus Act) prohibits the use of the Armed Forces as a Posse comitatus to execute the laws except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.

Bush did not have the legal authority to drop federal troops or National Guard from other states into Louisiana without the request or approval of the Governor of the State of Louisiana. Governor Blanco didn't give approval until well into the third day after the levee broke. Does the left think that Bush should have played fast and loose with the law, or even downright violated it by sending in other states National Guard or Federal troops.

YOU BET YOUR SWEET ASS THEY DO, because that would have been just the excuse they need to actually catch Bush doing something wrong. You can bet dollars to doughnuts that shortly after federal troops hit the ground in N.O. over the objections of the Governor, that Senator John Kerry or most probably Ted Kennedy would be calling for impeachment (the Dems aren't going to rest until they can get a Republican President impeached, regardless of the facts, so they can feel avenged for having their guy impeached).

Blaming Bush for anything related to the disaster that Katrina has become is ludicrous at this point. The President is NOT a micro-manager, and no one with any intelligence wants him to be. FEMA director Brown may have made some mistakes, and he'll probably pay for them and others that aren't his, DHS Chertof will take some heat too, and when all is played out, there may be some other administration officials that take heat rightly so and unjustly, but "blame" does not belong on the head of Bush.

But I will tell you where it belongs:

Clarence Nagin Jr., Mayor of New Orleans, if anyone deserves blame it's this worthless excuse for an elected official in a time of crisis. Mayor Nagin had to be essentially TOLD by the President of the United States that his city was in immediate danger and needed to be evacuated. Mayor Nagin, finally, called for the evacuation with less than 24 hours before the storm's landfall south of New Orleans.

Delaying the evacuation isn't all of it though. Mayor Nagin also miserably failed to implement the Hurricane Evacuation Plan for the city of New Orleans. He failed to evacuate those people that collected at city shelters via the buses he had at his disposal (ironically, within 24 hours of the levee breach, Nagin was in front of TV cameras blaming Bush for not sending buses, when he ordered the evacuation when he had over 1000 buses, that he never even tried to budge).


Click image for more info on these buses.


More buses Nagin had the authority and responsibility to use here:


When Nagin failed to follow the evacuation plan for New Orleans, he threw a HUGE monkey-wrench into the activities and responsibility of the Lousiana National Guard, who now had to shift gears to manage the masses converging on the Superdome. His failure disrupted the State of Louisiana Disaster Management officials and plans, which in turn set the State of Louisiana against the city and federal government. Nagin's failure left a gap between the First Responders on the ground in New Orleans and the Federal efforts. When Nagin abandoned all the plans in place, he sent the city into chaos, the National Guard had to play catch-up, the Fire and EMS officials had no plan left to follow, the Police became incoherent and simply disintegrated.

Nagins failure travelled throughout the city, state and all the all the way to Washington D.C. His failure caused a communications breakdown and total absence of civil authority, leaving the city in the dark to the outside world and the outside world clueless about the real situation inside the city.

Nagins failure is as inexcusable as it is tragic, but no doubt, he'll be defended by the left, as will Blanco. The fact that Nagin had the means and opportunity to save thousands of lives will be ignored, the facts that Blanco broke down and became totally incompetent, and at times counter-productive will be glossed over. The Robert Kennedy Jr.'s of the world will blame the republicans and global warning regardless, and the Michael Moore's will claim that we don't have enough troops to deal with this because they are all over in Iraq, despite the fact that less that 13% of the US military might is deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan combined.

The Left in general will blame Bush, they will develop conspiracy theory after conspiracy, about how this was all a plot to kill off the poor, or that it was some secret weather manipulation plot, or that it's all just another way to get Haliburton more contracts, or that somehow this is all a plot against the black man. It's ridiculous really, but easy to see when you have Oprah wanting overflights along with the NAACP, or when Sean Penn shows up with a boat that almost sinks (through his own incompetance for not putting the drain plug in) and a motor that won't start, that Katrina in the eyes of the left is not a tragedy, they view it as an opportunity.

Go ahead Lefties, blame Bush, harp over and over how it's all Bushitler's fault that he created the hurricane, then broke the levees, then plotted to get rid of a few thousand poor people. Keep ranting your pink heads off, keep being chicken little and looking for your equivalent of the blue dress, we don't buy your "false but accurate" thinking anymore.

Over here to the right of center, we'll keep on winning elections and managing the nation.

Back on topic, Clarence Nagin Jr. killed New Orleans, just as sure as he were the hurricane itself, he should never be forgiven for leaving the citizenry of New Orleans literally out in the rain when he had the ability and the assets in place to save them, and subsequently, save the city itself.

--Jason

Posted by JasonColeman at September 5, 2005 10:34 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.jasoncoleman.com/MT/mt-tb.cgi/179

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Thoughts on Katrina, a beginning. . . .:

» Hurricane Katrina III: Reflection from Riehl World View
It's been very hard to put together something about the disaster in New Orleans. N.O. is my hometown, the place of my birth and where I came to realize who I was and what the world around me was like. [Read More]

Tracked on September 7, 2005 5:35 AM

Comments

Re: U. S. Carbon Sink:
"Despite the fact that land sinks help remove carbon from the atmosphere, the U.S. continues to emit more carbon than it removes. In 1990, for example, the country released 1.337 billion tons from fossil fuel emissions, making it a net source of between two-thirds and 1 billion tons of carbon per year.

"However, America's forests won't soak up the greenhouse gases forever. The sink will begin to diminish and eventually disappear as the forests reach maturity. Even if the country could slow fossil fuel consumption and maintain current levels of carbon dioxide emissions, says Pacala, the U.S. net contribution to atmospheric accumulation would continue to rise as the benefit of the sink goes away."

http://www.unh.edu/news/news_releases/2001/june/sk_20010621carbon.html

Posted by: Avram Mirsky at September 7, 2005 8:50 AM

I live on the tx gulf coast and when katrina entered the gulf coast all area school buses were fuled up and ready to evacuate if need be and we werent even in area it was headed but we were ready so wassup with louisanna

Posted by: michele at September 7, 2005 11:37 PM

i totaly agree with u even though i dont live there i makes me devisated.

Posted by: angel at November 14, 2005 8:22 PM

I ONLY HAVE 2 THINGS TO SAY TO YOU JASON,
1) (THESE PEOPLE)- AS YOU STATED IN YOUR PARAGRAPH WERE ALL HUMAN BEINGS AND DESERVE NO LESS THAN YOU WOULD.

2) YOU PUT OUT YOUR RACISM FOR THE WORLD TO SEE BY PUTTING A NAME ON THE VICTIMS: A- FEW- THOUSAND- POOR- PEOPLE! I GUESS THAT MEANS DIDDLY SQUAT TO YOU, IF IT WAS A FEW THOUSAND POOR WHITE PEOPLE, YOU WOULD HAVE WORDED IT DIFFERENTLY, NOW WOULDN'T YOU? I DO AGREE THERE WAS MAJOR FAILURE ON THE PART OF LOUISIANAS GOVERMENT. BUT YOU MY FRIEND ARE NOT AT ALL THE RIGHT PERSON TO BE WRITING ABOUT IT. BECAUSE YOU COULD CARE LESS ABOUT THE SOULS THAT DIED AND THE FAMILIES LEFT SUFFERING BEHIND THIER DEATHS. I WILL NOT READ YOUR BLOG AGAIN, BUT I WIL LET PEOPLE THAT I KNOW LIVING IN NEW ORLEANS, ABOUT THIS MOST TENATIOUS PEICE YOU WROTE ABOUT THEM, AND HOW YOU USED SUCH HEARTLESS WORDS TO DESCRIBE THEM AND THIER PAIN...............

Posted by: EARTH CHILD at September 13, 2006 9:24 AM

Earth Child,

Thank you for taking the time to comment on a post on my blog. I'm curious however, did you read the post? It doesn't appear that you did.

Here's the link to the post you commented on so perhaps you can actually read what you tried to criticize.

http://www.jasoncoleman.com/BlogArchives/2005/09/hurricane_katri.html


Now I'll respond to your comment.

I ONLY HAVE 2 THINGS TO SAY TO YOU JASON,
1) (THESE PEOPLE)- AS YOU STATED IN YOUR PARAGRAPH WERE ALL HUMAN BEINGS AND DESERVE NO LESS THAN YOU WOULD.

Firstly, the "these people" mentioned in the post was NOT, I repeat NOT, referring to those who perished in New Orleans, or elsewhere as a result of Hurricane Katrina. If you take the time to actually read the post, the phrase "these people" refer to those who seek only to paint this event with a racist brush.

Here is the first instance of the use of "these people"


"Others try to blame Bush by saying he's racist, wants black people to die and somehow delayed efforts to get the poor out of New Orleans. It doesn't matter to these people that it was actually President Bush that prompted the evacuation[1] after local officials refused to do so"

As you can see, the reference to "these people" does not refer to Katrina victims. The phrase "these people" refer to those who would blame Bush first by saying that he is racist. They are the pundits and politicos and partisans who from before the storm even struck decided to view Katrina through a racial lens. The phrase "these people" in this case does not in any way shape or form refer to those who were abandoned by Mayor Nagin in the immediate aftermath of the storm.


I also use the phrase "those people"

"Delaying the evacuation isn't all of it though. Mayor Nagin also miserably failed to implement the Hurricane Evacuation Plan for the city of New Orleans. He failed to evacuate those people that collected at city shelters via the buses he had at his disposal (ironically, within 24 hours of the levee breach,"

In this case, I'm referring to those people who collected at city shelters. I'm not referring to black people. I'm not referring to white people, I'm referring to people who went to the designated shelters as the Hurricane Evacuation plan instructed them to and who expected at this point to be transported out of the city. There was an exercise the previous year in New Orleans, called "Hurricane Pam" in which the citizens of New Orleans were instructed and practiced travelling to designated shelters for evacuation. In the run up to Katrina, people did as they were expected and collected at these shelters awaiting busses to transport them out of the city. Nagin failed to implement the plan and the busses never showed. Leaving "those people that collected at city shelters". I should tell you that black citizens of New Orleans were NOT, I repeat NOT the only ones to gather at such shelters, and for the record, it doesn't matter one whit to me whether those people who were abandoned by Mayor Nagin were black, white, hispanic, Korean, Indian, Somali, Vietnamese or other. "Those people" were the ones who followed the city evacuation plan, which they had previously practiced in the Pam exercise.

In both cases, I do not denigrate the positions of "these people" or "those people" by using the phrases as an indication of race as you assert. In the first case "these people" are NOT the victims of Katrina, and in the second case, "those people" refers to those who were abandoned by the Mayor of the city who failed to enact the Hurricane Evacuation Plan of the City of New Orleans.

Your assertions are off base, incorrect and show that you failed to read or even attempt to comprehend the written word.

Moving on. . .

2) YOU PUT OUT YOUR RACISM FOR THE WORLD TO SEE BY PUTTING A NAME ON THE VICTIMS: A- FEW- THOUSAND- POOR- PEOPLE! I GUESS THAT MEANS DIDDLY SQUAT TO YOU, IF IT WAS A FEW THOUSAND POOR WHITE PEOPLE, YOU WOULD HAVE WORDED IT DIFFERENTLY, NOW WOULDN'T YOU? I DO AGREE THERE WAS MAJOR FAILURE ON THE PART OF LOUISIANAS GOVERMENT. BUT YOU MY FRIEND ARE NOT AT ALL THE RIGHT PERSON TO BE WRITING ABOUT IT. BECAUSE YOU COULD CARE LESS ABOUT THE SOULS THAT DIED AND THE FAMILIES LEFT SUFFERING BEHIND THIER DEATHS. I WILL NOT READ YOUR BLOG AGAIN, BUT I WIL LET PEOPLE THAT I KNOW LIVING IN NEW ORLEANS, ABOUT THIS MOST TENATIOUS PEICE YOU WROTE ABOUT THEM, AND HOW YOU USED SUCH HEARTLESS WORDS TO DESCRIBE THEM AND THIER PAIN...............

Again, you've completely misrepresented the words you seek to criticize.


"Go ahead Lefties, blame Bush, harp over and over how it's all Bushitler's fault that he created the hurricane, then broke the levees, then plotted to get rid of a few thousand poor people. Keep ranting your pink heads off, keep being chicken little and looking for your equivalent of the blue dress, we don't buy your "false but accurate" thinking anymore."

Notice here that I am not using the phrase "a few thousand poor people" to describe the victims of Katrina, I'm referring to the partisan leftists who characterized those who were stranded in New Orleans that way. At the time this post was written, numerous figures were characterizing those left behind in New Orleans as "too poor to leave", "too poor to understand what was happening" or "thousands of poor people". Those who sought to criticize the federal administration and hold the Mayor and Governor of New Orleans and Louisiana respectively harmless for their failures to administer their end of the evacuation plan.

Those words were bandied about throughout the storm and the aftermath, not by me, but by others. READ THE PARAGRAPH Earth Girl, because if you do, you'll see that the words "a few thousand poor people" is a statement I fervently DISAGREE with, it's not a phrasing I'm using to describe what happened, it's phrasing I'm disagree with. The Katrina conspiracy crowd tries to characterize this as an assault on "a few thousand poor people", I'm disagreeing with that assessment.

Your attempts to paint me as a racist are simply incorrect. Throughout this post you commented on with out actually reading or comprehending I'm on the side of those who were abandoned in the aftermath of Katrina by their local and state government who had the legal responsibility to evacuate them. You chose to make this racist charge against me because you didn't read or comprehend the words. You see the phrase "these people" and you assume it's a racial statement, when in reality it only refers to the group mentioned in the previous sentence.

I'll also point out to you that it WAS white citizens of New Orleans who were disproportionately affected by Katrina. A greater per capita percentage of white New Orleaneans died as a result of Katrina and the aftermath than did black New Orleaneans. Yes, Earth Girl, go look at the list of those who died and their race. You'll see that there was a vast disproportion of white citizens killed in this event than black citizens given the demographic makeup of New Orleans.

As for me not being the one to write about it. I really thank you for your suggestion that I should not have the right to speak about an event that greatly affected me and my family. Perhaps you didn't realize that I'm from New Orleans, that much of my family still lives there, and that they too lost their homes, their possessions and many were abandoned in shelters waiting for the evacuation the city told them would be forthcoming, but which never came. Perhaps you've missed the other posts I made on the day the city was reopened to civilians (I was there that morning, among the first to re-enter the city. But of course, since you chose to mis-read and fail to comprehend and only choose to see words in racial context, you now want to claim that I can't write about my experiences and my thoughts on the event. Thank you for being so stand up in your desire to seek censorship and paint others with a racist brush.

The only racist behavior here is your characterizations of me and mis-characterizations of what I've written. Next time, take the time to read before you comment.

You've chosen the wrong target. These people left abandoned in shelters were members of my family, like my 79 year old grandmother who sat for 4 days staring at a wall with no food and little water, waiting for the evacuation that local officials promised and did not deliver. Those people include other relatives of mine who spent weeks and months at my home and other family members homes while they came to grips that their homes were destroyed, their lives irrevocably changed, their pets dead, their friends dead and their future uncertain.

Next time you decide to go fight racial wars, be sure your target is appropriate, in this case, it was not.

Unlike you, however, I welcome your opinion even if I disagree with it, I would never propose that you don't have the right to speak out, I'm just going to call you on it when you're patently incorrect.

--Jason


UPDATE: Unfortunately "Earth Girl" left a false email address, so I had to post this response here. I always find it funny when people leave a false email address but try to make it appear real as "Earth Girl" did. When "these people" do this, it speaks volumes on their motives.

Posted by: Jason Coleman at September 13, 2006 2:02 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)